<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>From Vegas To Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reguligence.biz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reguligence.biz</link>
	<description>Your update on intellectual property, information technology and regulatory matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='reguligence.biz' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://reguligence.biz/osd.xml" title="From Vegas To Legal" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://reguligence.biz/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Men infringing copyright at work</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/07/08/men-infringing-copyright-at-work/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/07/08/men-infringing-copyright-at-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down under]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men at work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrikin music publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacobson j]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kookaburra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you come from a land down under? Where music labels are keen to plunder? I guess my readers will excuse this little joke with Men At Work&#8217;s &#8220;Down Under&#8221; lyrics, but it fits quite good in the context of this posting. I believe it is needless to introduce &#8220;Down Under&#8221; &#8211; you hardly cannot [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=532&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/07/08/men-infringing-copyright-at-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do not misappropriate the law, guys.</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/06/25/do-not-misappropriate-the-law-guys/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/06/25/do-not-misappropriate-the-law-guys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chitanka.info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gdbop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police raid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitation of copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair dealing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicly accessible library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public libraries act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a long time since I wrote my last posting related to Bulgaria. During the last days, however, a police campaign or even a raid directed against the online content provider www. chitanka.info (chitanka meaning an alphabet book in Bulgarian) achieved a huge medial attention and, particularly, the one of the Bulgarian blogosphere. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=513&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/06/25/do-not-misappropriate-the-law-guys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Ireland eventually overthrow data retention?</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/05/26/will-ireland-eventually-overthrow-data-retention/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/05/26/will-ireland-eventually-overthrow-data-retention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 12:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital rights ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european court of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ireland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has not been much discussion in the aftermath of the German Constitutional Court&#8217;s ruling on data retention and the matter somehow started to collect legal dust. The recent Irish involvement, however, could cause the necessary aeration and preserve the issue from getting buried in oblivion. Digital Rights Ireland, a non-governmental organization formed as a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=508&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/05/26/will-ireland-eventually-overthrow-data-retention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumers need not pay for delivery, when withdrawing from a distance contract</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/04/15/consumers-need-not-pay-for-delivery-when-withdrawing-from-a-distance-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/04/15/consumers-need-not-pay-for-delivery-when-withdrawing-from-a-distance-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delivery cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directive on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distance contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to withdraw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verbraucherzentralle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you been dispirited to buy things online due to uncertainty as to how far is the reach of your consumer rights? Then if you have, I may hereby present a ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) that provides for more legal clarity and encourages consumers to rely on their [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=501&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/04/15/consumers-need-not-pay-for-delivery-when-withdrawing-from-a-distance-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ISO Hunted Down</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/04/01/iso-hunted-down/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/04/01/iso-hunted-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file-sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isohunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[district court for the central district of california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary fung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mgm vs grokster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stories involving file-sharing networks and copyright enforcers have become easily predictible: the latter commence court proceedings against the former and after a lengthy judicial argy-bargy (almost always) prevail thereby having the enabling network shut down. Unfortunately for all file-sharers among my readers, this post tells a story that makes no exception to the foregoing. It [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=489&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/04/01/iso-hunted-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s AdWords do not infringe trade marks!</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/24/googles-adwords-do-not-infringe-trade-marks-2/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/24/googles-adwords-do-not-infringe-trade-marks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ECJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[louis vuitton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poiares maduro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viaticum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thonet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my blog&#8217;s posts that has been attracting a huge user attention and hence traffic is the one relating to the case of Louis Vuitton et al vs Google. I wrote it some months ago with the purpose to cover the highly controversial opinion of Poiares Maduro, being the Advocate General assigned to this [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=472&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/24/googles-adwords-do-not-infringe-trade-marks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to hit a misappropriating fly on the wall</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/20/how-to-hit-a-misappropriating-fly-on-the-wall/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/20/how-to-hit-a-misappropriating-fly-on-the-wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[unfair competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barclay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merril lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misappropriation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morgan stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theflyonthewall.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine you were a farmer and invested lots of time and effort to sow seeds and watched the crops grow. Now imagine another farmer who attempted to harvest your crops without having invested any time and labour therein. Would you allow such farmer to reap your crops? You most probably would not. In a very [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=463&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/20/how-to-hit-a-misappropriating-fly-on-the-wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>When a rapper equals a tazo</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/18/when-a-rapper-equals-a-tazo/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/18/when-a-rapper-equals-a-tazo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community design right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pepsico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tazo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overall impression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informed user]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you remember when you lastly unleashed a pog from a bottle or a cup containing a light drink? Such pogs are also referred to as &#8220;rappers&#8221; or &#8211; in Spain and Mexico &#8211; as &#8220;tazos&#8221;. Never mind when, I bet you never thought of those things as of subjects of intellectual property protection. Well, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=451&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/18/when-a-rapper-equals-a-tazo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/09/spam/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/09/spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encheva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess every Internet and e-mail user has at least once received a spam, scam or any other sort of a junk mail in their inbox. So far, the system admins at my employer have always managed to filter such undesired messages. Yesterday, however, I received an e-mail that has apparently succeeded to overcome the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=439&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/09/spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>German Constitutional Court abrogates provisions on data retention</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/03/german-constitutional-court-abrogates-provisions-on-data-retention/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/03/german-constitutional-court-abrogates-provisions-on-data-retention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bundesverfassungsgericht]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BVerfG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[german constitutional court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verhältnismäßigkeitsgrundsatz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hear ye, hear ye, you all supporters of the fundamental right of privacy &#8211; 7 out of 8 German Constitutional Justices voted to declare the data retention provisions as applied in the Telecommunications Act and in the Code on Criminal Procedure null and void! Enough of enthusiasm, however, we can go on observing the facts [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=424&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/03/german-constitutional-court-abrogates-provisions-on-data-retention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>