<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>From Vegas To Legal &#187; data protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reguligence.biz/category/data-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reguligence.biz</link>
	<description>Your update on intellectual property, information technology and regulatory matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='reguligence.biz' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://reguligence.biz/osd.xml" title="From Vegas To Legal" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://reguligence.biz/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Spam</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/09/spam/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/09/spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encheva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess every Internet and e-mail user has at least once received a spam, scam or any other sort of a junk mail in their inbox. So far, the system admins at my employer have always managed to filter such undesired messages. Yesterday, however, I received an e-mail that has apparently succeeded to overcome the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=439&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2010/03/09/spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you still use Yahoo!, if you knew they sold your personal data at a fixed price?</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2009/12/16/would-you-still-use-yahoo-if-you-knew-they-sold-your-personal-data-at-a-fixed-price/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2009/12/16/would-you-still-use-yahoo-if-you-knew-they-sold-your-personal-data-at-a-fixed-price/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chilling effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takedown notice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you got an e-mail account on Yahoo! or do you use any of the services, such as messenger, groups or Flickr, provided by the Sunnyvale company? You were certainly aware of Yahoo!&#8217;s privacy policy, weren&#8217;t you? What you most probably did not know is the fact that Yahoo! surveil your personal data and then [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=285&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2009/12/16/would-you-still-use-yahoo-if-you-knew-they-sold-your-personal-data-at-a-fixed-price/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the data retention directive be fully implemented across Europe: a reprise.</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2009/12/14/will-the-data-retention-directive-be-fully-implemented-across-europe-a-reprise/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2009/12/14/will-the-data-retention-directive-be-fully-implemented-across-europe-a-reprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[german constitutional court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implementation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About an year ago I composed one of my first blog postings and asked &#8220;Will the data retention directive be fully implemented across Europe?&#8221;. The reason behind was the then pending decision of the ECJ caused by Ireland&#8217;s concern on the data retention directive&#8217;s grounds legitimacy and, the wrong way the directive was initially  implemented [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=278&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2009/12/14/will-the-data-retention-directive-be-fully-implemented-across-europe-a-reprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romanian Constitutional Court abrogates data retention act</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/27/romanian-constitutional-court-abrogates-data-retention-act/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/27/romanian-constitutional-court-abrogates-data-retention-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abrogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breadth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innocent bystander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertainty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The framers of the Data Retention Directive must have underestimated several factors in the course of its subsequent implementation. First Ireland brought a challenge before the ECJ then Austria still shows totally reluctant to implement. However, the big bang is currently unrivalled owned by Romania! This country&#8217;s Constitutional Court is the first to deliver a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=240&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/27/romanian-constitutional-court-abrogates-data-retention-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The US cares for data protection</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/24/the-us-cares-for-data-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/24/the-us-cares-for-data-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu data protection directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe harbor arrangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transfer of personal data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I agree the title of this post reads somewhat provocative. Nevertheless, it is driven by the criticism that European data protection practitioners usually express towards their US colleagues&#8217; approach when dealing with privacy and protection of personal data. This should not surprise as the right to privacy is a highly developed area of law [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=200&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/24/the-us-cares-for-data-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data retention in Austria becomes even likelier</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/22/data-retention-in-austria-becomes-even-likelier/</link>
		<comments>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/22/data-retention-in-austria-becomes-even-likelier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file-sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Austria&#8217;s DerStandard informs that the data retention bill to amend the existing Austrian Telecommunications Act was in place. In a consultation procedure, the responsible minister Doris Bures has called upon the appraisal of the participants (eg regional authorities, chamber for commerce and industry, trade unions). She thereby vowed to apply &#8220;the highest standards under the [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=reguligence.biz&blog=10593575&post=188&subd=reguligence&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reguligence.biz/2009/11/22/data-retention-in-austria-becomes-even-likelier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/73faa1df945e98b31da74e05faa9da18?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">bulgarus</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>