<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the data retention directive be fully implemented across Europe: a reprise.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reguligence.biz/2009/12/14/will-the-data-retention-directive-be-fully-implemented-across-europe-a-reprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reguligence.biz/data-protection/will-the-data-retention-directive-be-fully-implemented-across-europe-a-reprise/</link>
	<description>Critical Discussions On Information Technology, Intellectual Property And Privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 12:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: German Constitutional Court abrogates provisions on data retention &#171; From Vegas To Legal</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/data-protection/will-the-data-retention-directive-be-fully-implemented-across-europe-a-reprise/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>German Constitutional Court abrogates provisions on data retention &#171; From Vegas To Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=278#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] months ago nearly 35 000 German citizens filed a mass-complaint in which they asked the Court to abrogate the provisions on data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago nearly 35 000 German citizens filed a mass-complaint in which they asked the Court to abrogate the provisions on data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil A. Georgiev</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/data-protection/will-the-data-retention-directive-be-fully-implemented-across-europe-a-reprise/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil A. Georgiev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=278#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Unfortunately I could hardly predict when the Court will deliver its ruling, however this is not the first time this Court deals with data retention questions. In March and October 2008 urgent motions were referred to the Court and it issued interim orders by thus limiting providers&#039; handover obligations with respect to retained data.

Yes, I am aware of the legislative deliberations in Bulgaria and, in particular, with the ministry of interior&#039;s greediness to access and stockpile data. Another Constitutional Court&#039;s affirmative decision, I believe, should be able to persuade the legislators in Bulgaria to at least reconsider some of the aspects of the current bill. For example the drafters of the Austrian bill neither defined an &quot;interface&quot; term nor did they implement the existing ETSI interface recommendation. They simply proposed a technology neutral handover of retained data in a .CSV file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Unfortunately I could hardly predict when the Court will deliver its ruling, however this is not the first time this Court deals with data retention questions. In March and October 2008 urgent motions were referred to the Court and it issued interim orders by thus limiting providers&#8217; handover obligations with respect to retained data.</p>
<p>Yes, I am aware of the legislative deliberations in Bulgaria and, in particular, with the ministry of interior&#8217;s greediness to access and stockpile data. Another Constitutional Court&#8217;s affirmative decision, I believe, should be able to persuade the legislators in Bulgaria to at least reconsider some of the aspects of the current bill. For example the drafters of the Austrian bill neither defined an &#8220;interface&#8221; term nor did they implement the existing ETSI interface recommendation. They simply proposed a technology neutral handover of retained data in a .CSV file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bisser Dyankov</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/data-protection/will-the-data-retention-directive-be-fully-implemented-across-europe-a-reprise/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Bisser Dyankov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.biz/?p=278#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Do you have any idea when we could expect the decision of the German Constitutional Court?

I know that you are familiar with the amazingly vigorous attempt of the Bulgarian authorities to obtain an access to the data flow of the Bulgarian internet and mobile communication users.. I wonder whether a decision of the German Constitutional Court could aid our efforts to prevent the promulgation of the drafted Bill..

Keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any idea when we could expect the decision of the German Constitutional Court?</p>
<p>I know that you are familiar with the amazingly vigorous attempt of the Bulgarian authorities to obtain an access to the data flow of the Bulgarian internet and mobile communication users.. I wonder whether a decision of the German Constitutional Court could aid our efforts to prevent the promulgation of the drafted Bill..</p>
<p>Keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

