Comments on: Google’s AdWords do not infringe trade marks?

By: Julio Deshazior

Julio Deshazior — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:06:15 +0000

Good information in your blogpost, I watched a report on tv yesterday about this same thing and since I am going to be married in two weeks and the timing could not have been better! thanks for the tip!, I have bookmarked, thanks Julio Deshazior

By: Emil A. Georgiev

Emil A. Georgiev — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:11:20 +0000

Hi, you may reckon I will update the blog on issues like that!

By: Sherryl Lueckenbach

Sherryl Lueckenbach — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:33:56 +0000

Personally I feel that Google Buzz’s release was a little premature, especially the privacy concerns. I also think that Google’s most likely going down the same future that Windows experienced around the time of Windows ME. The latest products and products seem to be less thought out and I feel that rushed in an attempt to be 1st to market, and compete with a competitors release. The privacy issue was was a problem that didn’t require was a very simple issue to figure out, a very simple idea session would have shown such issues. Do you think Google may have received too much credit last year?

By: Black Belt Live Case Study Review

Black Belt Live Case Study Review — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:07:25 +0000

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.

By: Keyword advertising actionable under privacy law? « From Vegas To Legal

Keyword advertising actionable under privacy law? « From Vegas To Legal — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:27:37 +0000

[...] of such trade marks proprietors’ claims (see Google AdWords Litigation update for the US and Advocate General Poiares Maduro’s opinion on Google’s AdWords to the ECJ for Europe) might have brought a Wisconsin law firm to observe this set of problems through a [...]