<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No three-strikes out &#8211; EU Parliament rejects Sarkozy&#8217;s plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reguligence.biz/2009/05/07/no-three-strikes-out-eu-parliament-rejects-sarkozys-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reguligence.biz/copyright/no-three-strikes-out-eu-parliament-rejects-sarkozys-plan/</link>
	<description>Critical Discussions On Information Technology, Intellectual Property And Privacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Breach To Compromise Them All &#171; The Reguligence Weblog</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/copyright/no-three-strikes-out-eu-parliament-rejects-sarkozys-plan/#comment-3660</link>
		<dc:creator>One Breach To Compromise Them All &#171; The Reguligence Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 19:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/no-three-strikes-out-eu-parliament-rejects-sarkozys-plan#comment-3660</guid>
		<description>[...] the country which advertised the three strikes rule on a large scale and did eventually adopt it, has also a watchdog. A dog to watch for file-sharing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the country which advertised the three strikes rule on a large scale and did eventually adopt it, has also a watchdog. A dog to watch for file-sharing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACTA &#8211; a much ado about nothing or a real menace to our digital freedom? &#171; The Reguligence Weblog</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/copyright/no-three-strikes-out-eu-parliament-rejects-sarkozys-plan/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>ACTA &#8211; a much ado about nothing or a real menace to our digital freedom? &#171; The Reguligence Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 22:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/no-three-strikes-out-eu-parliament-rejects-sarkozys-plan#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>[...] technology&#8221;. In regards to the latter, ACTA is feared by many to bring the so called &#8220;three strikes and you are out&#8221; rule that would eventually lead to an internet denial for, say, users of infringing file sharing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology&#8221;. In regards to the latter, ACTA is feared by many to bring the so called &#8220;three strikes and you are out&#8221; rule that would eventually lead to an internet denial for, say, users of infringing file sharing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACTA &#8211; a much ado about nothing or a real menace to our digital freedom? &#171; From Vegas To Legal</title>
		<link>http://reguligence.biz/copyright/no-three-strikes-out-eu-parliament-rejects-sarkozys-plan/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>ACTA &#8211; a much ado about nothing or a real menace to our digital freedom? &#171; From Vegas To Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reguligence.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/no-three-strikes-out-eu-parliament-rejects-sarkozys-plan#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] technology&#8221;. In regards to the latter, ACTA is feared by many to bring the so called &#8220;three strikes and you are out&#8221; rule that would practically lead to an internet denial for, say, users of infringing file sharing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology&#8221;. In regards to the latter, ACTA is feared by many to bring the so called &#8220;three strikes and you are out&#8221; rule that would practically lead to an internet denial for, say, users of infringing file sharing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

